In the Pakistani community, the risk of babies born with birth defects is doubled among first cousins, according to a study, which found that infant mortality rates and birth defects exceeded.
Researchers have concluded that the cultural process of marriage between first cousins is a bigger factor than any other – far more than the effects of deprivation in the parts of Bradford where this study was conducted. Marriage to a blood relative accounts for about one-third (31%) of all birth defects in children of Pakistani descent.
The risk of having a baby, usually from heart or nervous system problems – which can sometimes be fatal – is still small, but in the general Pakistani population it increases from 3% to 6% of blood relatives. The researchers also said that the risk also doubled among children of white British women over the age of 34. This risk has increased from 2% to 4%, it is already known.
Every year more than 90 deaths due to birth defects occur in the Pakistani community in England and Wales. But this is a very sensitive issue because marriage in families is an established cultural tradition of Pakistani descent.
Related posts:
Pakistan's inflation climbs to an annual rate of 13.98%
IMF Report on Corruption in Pakistan Deemed Biased and Inappropriate, Says NAB Chairman
Eight things to see in the Northern Areas of Pakistan
Pakistan Issues Three LNG Cargo Tenders for the First Time Since 2023
Poverty and Unemployment May Rise, State Bank Warns
Mahmood Khan Achakzai angry with PTI leadership, unlikely to attend Mardan rally
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team