Rawalpindi: An inquiry could not be launched on allegations of multi‑million‑rupee fraud in the monthly ration of prisoners at Adiala Jail. A petition filed with the Punjab Home Department and the Chief Minister accuses the jail administration and head clerk of colluding to replace the weekly 540‑gram chicken meat budget per inmate with lentils, siphoning off the allocated funds. The petition states that in just the past year, more than Rs 1,15,24,000 earmarked for chicken meat was embezzled. It describes the method: each week a meat turn is missed and lentils are given, and four times a month chicken is swapped for lentils, allowing large sums to be pocketed. The petition further alleges that corruption extends to the daily sale of 60 kg of bread pieces collected in the jail, generating monthly losses exceeding Rs 45 lakh.
Related posts:
Historic Surge in Government Loans During First Two Years of Current Administration, Debt ...
Pakistan’s Strong Ties Complicate US Trust in India, Says International Journal
Air Chief Marshal Zahir Ahmed Babur Sadhu Stunned by Enemy’s Power and Skill at May Battle
Researchers found that Cousin Marriages leading to more birth defects in Pakistan
Top 10 Places to Visit in Pakistan
Second US‑Iran Negotiation Round to be Held in Pakistan on Tuesday, US TV Claims Based on ...
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
