Gancha (Malik Saqi) Jamaat‑e‑Islami’s GBA‑22 Gancha‑One nominated candidate Hafiz Rahmatullah stated that three additional candidates from Gancha constituency‑2 will withdraw in favor of Engineer Zakar and Fida Mangol under the alliance. He appealed to Haji Abdul Hamid from Brah to step down in their favor, noting that Haji Abdul Hamid succeeded under the Brah alliance, while Haji Anwar Ali could have won without any alliance and did not need one. Hafiz Rahmatullah warned that the incompetence of leaders from various political parties in Gancha has eroded public trust in political parties. He added that if the political leadership had litigated Gancha’s issues effectively, public confidence in parties would be restored today. He acknowledged that Haji Abdul Hamid did accomplish work, but his priorities showed double standards. Furthermore, the lack of confidence and consultation with the core committee at that time has led a large segment of Union Council Brah to break away from the former municipal minister. Hafiz Rahmatullah concluded that under the Brah alliance, Haji Abdul Hamid played a key role in securing the victory of Brah Paeen.
Related posts:
Comprehensive Security, Traffic, and Medical Facilities Plan Prepared for Taos Yasin Visit...
Daimar Tree‑Planting Campaign Accelerates Against Climate Change, Thousands of Saplings Pl...
Astor NA-2: PPP Ideological Vote and Tribal Power Pose Threat to Opponents
Gilgit Crackdown on Inflation Mafia: Hotel Seized, Traders Fined
Baltistan University Launches “Maqraqa Haq o Bunyad Mursus” Events
Chilas, renowned political figure Haji Noshir withdraws in favor of PML‑N candidate Engine...
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team