According to Mohamad Elmasry, a professor at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, the US has dramatically altered its stated goals in the conflict due to its inability to make headway on key fronts. In an interview with Al Jazeera, Elmasry observed that President Trump’s initial approach to the war was marked by a lack of clarity, with objectives that were often vague and sometimes mutually exclusive.
Elmasry noted that the US has been grappling with a unified message since the outset, with shifting narratives on the prospect of regime change in Iran, diplomatic negotiations, and access to the Strait of Hormuz. Initially, US officials emphasized the importance of regime change, which Elmasry described as a primary objective of the operation. However, the narrative has since shifted, with US officials acknowledging the permanence of the Iranian regime.
Trump’s stance on negotiating a deal with Iran has also undergone a significant transformation, with the President now expressing skepticism about the need for such an agreement. Furthermore, Elmasry pointed out that Trump’s position on opening the Strait of Hormuz has also evolved. According to Elmasry, the US’s changing rhetoric is a direct consequence of its strategic failure to achieve its desired outcomes in the conflict.
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team