Iran’s retaliatory strategy has consistently included targeting Gulf nations from the outset of this conflict, prompting these countries to strongly oppose any escalation. Their concern is that if the US and Israel intensify their attacks on Iran’s energy infrastructure, Iran might retaliate by striking similar sites in the Gulf. Iran claims its attacks are limited to US military bases and assets, but evidence suggests otherwise, with civilian infrastructure and critical energy targets being hit over the past five weeks. Gulf leaders have corroborated this assessment.
In a recent development, Kuwait has sounded the alarm, citing increased missile and drone attacks that its air defence systems are struggling to counter. The past few days have seen desalination plants, oil refineries, and gas facilities come under attack. The GCC has maintained a measured stance in the face of these assaults, but countries are increasingly acknowledging that their patience is wearing thin. Saudi Arabia, in particular, has been vocal about its right to self-defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter in recent days.
Currently, the GCC is advocating for de-escalation and dialogue, with Qatar emphasizing the need for diplomatic settlements to end conflicts. However, if the situation escalates, some nations may reassess their defensive posture.
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team