National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Chairman Lieutenant General (Retired) Nazeer Ahmed said the IMF report on corruption in Pakistan is biased and inappropriate. In an informal conversation with senior journalists, Chairman NAB Lieutenant General (Retired) Nazeer Ahmed raised objections to the IMF report, stating that his confidence in the IMF has vanished, “We gave the IMF a lot of space, now it is even reaching the bedroom.” He added that he has decided not to take the IMF report seriously; although the IMF praised NAB in its assessment, it is not beneficial for the country, and people do not trust Transparency International’s report. Lieutenant General (Retired) Nazeer Ahmed claimed that the IMF, World Bank, and Transparency International have formed a triad that creates an unfavourable environment for nations they dislike. NAB officials assert that the IMF report’s data is inaccurate. NAB recorded a record recovery of 2.962 trillion rupees in the first quarter of 2026, a 33‑fold increase over the previous year. According to officials, under land recovery NAB reclaimed land worth over 2,950 billion rupees, and direct recovery amounted to 11.085 billion rupees, including proceeds from plunder and fines.
Related posts:
Researchers found that Cousin Marriages leading to more birth defects in Pakistan
Pakistan Issues Three LNG Cargo Tenders for the First Time Since 2023
Pakistani Embassy Passport Services Temporarily Suspended in Saudi Arabia and UAE
Second US‑Iran Negotiation Round to be Held in Pakistan on Tuesday, US TV Claims Based on ...
The Truth Behind the Trending Lighthouse Job in Iceland
Brazil's President Lula Says We Can't Tolerate Daily War Threat Tweets from Leaders, Criti...
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team