Federal Information Minister Ata Tarar said that India promotes terrorism while Pakistan combats it. In a press conference on Operation Bunyān Marṣūṣ, the minister said Pakistan gave a strong response to India’s baseless accusations. The Prime Minister presented a two‑point stance on the Peshawar incident and offered an impartial investigation. He added that after the offer of investigation Pakistan received international support. In his historic speech, the Prime Minister urged an end to the blame‑game, stating that Pakistan is fighting terrorism whereas India is fostering it. Ata Tarar claimed that the patterns of terrorism in Pakistan match those of India, describing Pakistan as a lead‑lined wall against terrorism, while India neither condemns terrorist acts nor expresses regret. The minister said India uses water as a weapon, and that Pakistan’s armed forces and people stand firm against any aggression. He emphasized that Pakistan has a clear anti‑terrorism policy and that the truth about Pakistan shines before the world. He further noted that the networks of BLA, TTP and other terrorist groups align with India, that Pakistan’s defence has become stronger than ever, and that no country is ready to accept India’s narrative. He said Pakistan gave a decisive reply to Indian aggression, India has not responded to the investigation offer, and Pakistan expressed sympathy for the victims of the Peshawar incident.
Related posts:
Pakistani Ship Issue: Federal Maritime Minister Writes to Somali Ambassador
Lahore: Fire in Scrap Warehouse Claims Lives of Three Young Children
CSS Exam 2025 Results Announced, 355 Candidates Pass
Why did Imran Khan blame Bollywood vulgarity as the reason for rising rape cases?
Asian Stock Markets Rally as Pakistan Stock Exchange Shows Negative Trend
Eight things to see in the Northern Areas of Pakistan
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team