Gancha (Malik Saqi) Jamaat‑e‑Islami’s GBA‑22 Gancha‑One nominated candidate Hafiz Rahmatullah stated that three additional candidates from Gancha constituency‑2 will withdraw in favor of Engineer Zakar and Fida Mangol under the alliance. He appealed to Haji Abdul Hamid from Brah to step down in their favor, noting that Haji Abdul Hamid succeeded under the Brah alliance, while Haji Anwar Ali could have won without any alliance and did not need one. Hafiz Rahmatullah warned that the incompetence of leaders from various political parties in Gancha has eroded public trust in political parties. He added that if the political leadership had litigated Gancha’s issues effectively, public confidence in parties would be restored today. He acknowledged that Haji Abdul Hamid did accomplish work, but his priorities showed double standards. Furthermore, the lack of confidence and consultation with the core committee at that time has led a large segment of Union Council Brah to break away from the former municipal minister. Hafiz Rahmatullah concluded that under the Brah alliance, Haji Abdul Hamid played a key role in securing the victory of Brah Paeen.
Related posts:
Decision to Further Strengthen Wheat Delivery and Monitoring System through FMIS
Excise, Zakat & Ushr, Cooperatives, and Narcotics Departments Ordered to Accelerate Digita...
Major political shock in Ghanche as Bakhtawar Shah announces joining PML‑Q
Baltistan University Launches “Maqraqa Haq o Bunyad Mursus” Events
Hunza Valley All things you need to know in 2026
Infectious Diseases Workshop at Karakoram International University, Gilgit
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team