The CSS exam 2025 results have been announced by the Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC). The success rate stood at just 2.67 %. Out of 12,792 candidates who sat for the written exam, only 355 passed. FPSC recommended appointments for 170 candidates, including 84 men and 86 women. Asad Rafiq secured the first position, Muhammad Mohsin Khalid took second place, and Tariq Hafeez ranked third. The top 30 candidates have been allocated to the Pakistan Administrative Service and the Pakistan Police Service, with none placed in the Foreign Service. Among these top 30, 23 are from Punjab, two each are from Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and three are from Balochistan.
Related posts:
Pakistan's economic crisis way forward
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Governor Briefed on Afghan Refugees' Repatriation Meeting
Eight things to see in the Northern Areas of Pakistan
Allama Iqbal Airport Launches Hajj Flights Under Makkah Road Initiative
Schengen Visa Requirements for Pakistanis When Traveling to Europe
Registrar of Pakistan Supreme Court Issues Judges Roster
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team