Federal Information Minister Ata Tarar said that India promotes terrorism while Pakistan combats it. In a press conference on Operation Bunyān Marṣūṣ, the minister said Pakistan gave a strong response to India’s baseless accusations. The Prime Minister presented a two‑point stance on the Peshawar incident and offered an impartial investigation. He added that after the offer of investigation Pakistan received international support. In his historic speech, the Prime Minister urged an end to the blame‑game, stating that Pakistan is fighting terrorism whereas India is fostering it. Ata Tarar claimed that the patterns of terrorism in Pakistan match those of India, describing Pakistan as a lead‑lined wall against terrorism, while India neither condemns terrorist acts nor expresses regret. The minister said India uses water as a weapon, and that Pakistan’s armed forces and people stand firm against any aggression. He emphasized that Pakistan has a clear anti‑terrorism policy and that the truth about Pakistan shines before the world. He further noted that the networks of BLA, TTP and other terrorist groups align with India, that Pakistan’s defence has become stronger than ever, and that no country is ready to accept India’s narrative. He said Pakistan gave a decisive reply to Indian aggression, India has not responded to the investigation offer, and Pakistan expressed sympathy for the victims of the Peshawar incident.
Related posts:
Mahmood Khan Achakzai angry with PTI leadership, unlikely to attend Mardan rally
Researchers found that Cousin Marriages leading to more birth defects in Pakistan
Governor of Punjab Sardar Saleem Haider Says He Won't Rest Until He Helps the Poor
Top 10 Places to Visit in Pakistan
The Door to Negotiations Remains Open on the Basis of Justice, Dignity, and Wisdom: Iran
Details of Women Abduction Cases Submitted to Lahore High Court
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team