The Indian claim of having killed two terrorists on the Line of Control (LOC) has been exposed as false. On 23 April 2025, the Indian assertion that two alleged terrorists were eliminated in the LOC area of Sarjior proved untrue, as local residents of Sarjior revealed the truth. The villagers said they have lived in the area for centuries and livestock theft is their livelihood; when livestock go missing they search for it. They said their elders, Malik Farooq and Muhammad Din, aged between 50 and 60, went to look for livestock near the LOC and were killed by the Indian army. The residents described the killing of unarmed individuals as a crime and oppression by the Indian army, calling the labeling of the two elders as terrorists a gross injustice.
Related posts:
Iranian Response Still Awaited for Participation in Peace Talks, Says Ata Tarar
Take Government Loans and Return Them to the Public – “This Is Injustice,” Says Hafiz Naee...
The Door to Negotiations Remains Open on the Basis of Justice, Dignity, and Wisdom: Iran
How to Maintain Diesel Generators for Long-Lasting Performance in Pakistan
Diesel‑laden Pakistani ship turns back after entering the Strait of Hormuz
Air Chief Marshal Zahir Ahmed Babur Sadhu Stunned by Enemy’s Power and Skill at May Battle
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team