With the US-Israel conflict in Iran causing a ripple effect on the Gulf region’s maritime routes, Pakistan’s ports have stepped up as key transit points, according to the country’s federal minister for maritime affairs. Muhammad Junaid Anwar Chaudhry revealed to Al Jazeera that the ports of Karachi and Gwadar have capitalized on the situation by drawing in increased transshipment traffic as safer alternatives.
Chaudhry pointed out that Karachi port achieved a remarkable milestone in March by handling more transshipment cargo in a single month than the entire year 2025. Meanwhile, Gwadar port successfully received its first transshipment vessel carrying general cargo. The Pakistani minister highlighted that the country is now handling a diverse range of cargo, including energy cargo, containerized cargo, transshipment, and LCL, as well as specialized cargo such as vehicles, perishables, and brake belts.
The benefits of Pakistan’s ports are being reaped by regional transit markets, international shipping lines, and countries seeking alternatives to the disrupted Gulf transshipment hub. The Iran war has had a devastating impact on global energy markets and maritime routes, with South Asia being one of the worst-hit regions due to the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.
Chaudhry emphasized that the situation in the Gulf has exposed Pakistan’s energy supply vulnerabilities, stranding vessels, and driving up freight costs. He noted that containers’ cargoes have been delayed due to reliance on Gulf hubs, resulting in shipping costs exceeding $5,000 per container.
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team