During an address to Hungarian university students, US Vice President JD Vance cautioned that the fragile ceasefire in place could be easily shattered if Iran fails to engage in genuine negotiations. As the Islamabad talks are set to commence later this week, Vance issued a stern warning to Tehran, underscoring the US’s unwavering commitment to a fair agreement.
“If the Iranians genuinely seek to collaborate with us, I firmly believe a mutually beneficial agreement can be reached,” Vance stated. “However, if they opt for deceit and dishonesty, they will ultimately face the consequences.” He emphasized that President Trump has explicitly instructed the entire negotiating team, comprising Secretary of State Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff, to engage in honest and transparent negotiations. Vance also highlighted the US’s considerable leverage, encompassing military, diplomatic, and economic measures, which will be deployed if Iran refuses to reciprocate.
Vance further noted that President Trump has expressed his assessment of Iran’s capabilities, stating that while they possess skilled negotiators, they are less formidable as combatants. Additionally, Vance pointed out the internal divisions within Iran regarding the deal, citing instances where officials have made contradictory statements on social media, with some proclaiming support for the ceasefire while others have been dishonest about its nature.
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
