In a stark warning, Iran’s military has signaled its readiness to unleash a broader campaign of attacks across the region if the United States proceeds with plans to target its critical infrastructure.
Iranian military officials, speaking through their spokesperson Ebrahim Zolfaghari, made it clear that any US-led strikes on Iranian infrastructure would be met with a devastating response, aimed squarely at US and Israeli-linked assets and facilities throughout the region.
Zolfaghari’s statement was a direct response to repeated threats from US President Donald Trump, who has vowed to destroy key Iranian infrastructure, including bridges, power plants, and energy facilities.
According to Zolfaghari, if these threats are carried out, Iran’s armed forces would retaliate by targeting US and Israeli-linked fuel, energy, and economic sites in the region, as well as assets in countries hosting American military bases.
In a veiled warning to countries hosting US forces, Zolfaghari suggested that these nations would be wise to pressure the US to withdraw its military presence if they wish to avoid becoming embroiled in the conflict.
The Iranian warning comes in response to Trump’s claim that US forces had destroyed Iran’s largest bridge, although it appears that the bridge in question was still under construction at the time of its collapse.
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team