Pakistan’s army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir donned military fatigues to greet the Iranian delegation upon their arrival in Islamabad on Friday night. However, when US Vice President J D Vance landed the following day, the army chief opted for a suit. This apparent change in attire has sparked curiosity about whether it signifies a deliberate choice or adherence to established protocol.
A retired general, who served under the tenure of former military ruler Pervez Musharraf, suggested that there is no set rule governing the dress code of the army chief when receiving foreign dignitaries. According to the general, who spoke to Al Jazeera on condition of anonymity, the decision often lies with the chief’s staff or his personal preference, which may be influenced by the image he wishes to project.
Another recently retired general downplayed the significance of the army chief’s attire, describing it as a minor detail in the grand scheme of diplomatic protocol. However, he acknowledged that the situation is extraordinary, and the usual rules do not apply when meeting high-ranking officials such as presidents or vice presidents.
The general noted that the deviation from standard protocol may be a reflection of the importance of the ongoing ceasefire talks, which have far-reaching implications not only for Pakistan but for the global community.
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team