Hamad Bin Khalifa University professor Sultan Barakat has cautioned that the language employed by Israeli and US officials implies Israel may be preparing for a nuclear assault.
According to Barakat, Israel’s intentions could manifest in a tactical nuclear strike of limited scope, allowing the country to assert its nuclear status without catastrophic regional consequences.
Barakat drew parallels between Trump’s bombastic rhetoric and the possibility of a surprise attack, suggesting that the former US president’s inflammatory statements hinted at a devastating outcome.
Israel’s nuclear capabilities have long been an open secret, despite the country’s official denials, and Barakat believes these capabilities have failed to serve as an effective deterrent.
The professor noted that Israel’s perceived vulnerability following Iran’s attacks has prompted a reevaluation of its nuclear strategy, with a focus on demonstrating its nuclear capabilities in a controlled manner.
Tactical nuclear arms, characterized by their reduced explosive power, are designed for battlefield use and could potentially be employed by Israel to achieve its objectives without unleashing widespread devastation.
Barakat’s warnings come as the White House has dismissed allegations of US plans to use nuclear weapons against Iran.
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team