The Quetta Gladiators’ early exit from the 2026 Pakistan Super League (PSL 11) has cast a spotlight on Usman Tariq, as Rilee Rossouw revealed that the spinner was battling a vision impairment before their crucial match against Karachi Kings. Following Quetta’s defeat, Rossouw was questioned about Usman Tariq’s performance, particularly after the spinner seemed vulnerable to Karachi’s batsmen. In response, Rossouw disclosed that Usman Tariq had been consulting a doctor due to an eye-related issue, which reportedly affected his depth perception, making it even more challenging for him during the high-pressure game. Despite the setback, Rossouw praised Usman Tariq for his willingness to put himself forward for selection and attempt to play through the problem. The Quetta skipper expressed unwavering support for the spinner, describing the underwhelming performance as an isolated incident rather than a sign of decline. He also expressed confidence in Usman Tariq’s ability to recover and regain his form, solidifying his position as one of the country’s top spin bowlers. The revelation has sparked concerns about Usman Tariq’s near-term prospects, particularly if the eye issue proves to be more severe than initially thought.
Related posts:
IPL vs PSL: Rilee Rossouw Weighs In On The Differences Between Two Leagues
PSL Star's National Team Omission Sparks Candid Response
PSL 11 All-Rounder Opens Up on Career Milestones and Team Dynamics
Lahore Qalandars' Title Defence Comes to an Abrupt End at the Hands of Hyderabad Kingsmen
Emerging PSL Talent Needs Maturity Before National Team Opportunities
Faheem Ashraf Stands Up for PSL Amid Hafeez's Criticism
Skardu.pk is one of the leading authentic news and information platform focusing on adventure tourism, regional and world affairs.
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team
- Editorial Team